AR
Anywhere Real Estate Inc. (HOUS)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 revenue rose 9% YoY to $1.36B and Operating EBITDA nearly doubled to $52M, driven by 13% YoY growth in combined closed transaction volume; GAAP EPS was a loss of $0.58 as impairments and restructuring and interest expense weighed on bottom line .
- Luxury brands (Sotheby’s International Realty, Corcoran, Coldwell Banker Global Luxury) continued to significantly outperform, with ~20% YoY luxury volume growth in Q4 and strong unit growth, reinforcing share gains at the high end .
- 2025 guide: Operating EBITDA “about $350M”; incremental ~$100M cost savings (offset in part by inflation and investments); FCF ex one‑time items similar to 2024; one‑time cash items ~$115M (antitrust $54M; legacy tax ~$40M; TCPA $20M) .
- Commission splits remained stable at ~80% (80.3% in Q4; 11th straight quarter), and January 2025 closed volume up ~12% YoY with open volume up ~4% YoY, suggesting momentum into Q1 despite macro headwinds and California wildfire impacts .
- Estimates context: S&P Global consensus was unavailable; third‑party data indicate a top‑line beat and EPS miss in Q4 (rev actual $1.36B vs $1.28B est; EPS actual -$0.58 vs -$0.36 est), with comparability caveats (non‑GAAP vs GAAP) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Luxury leadership: ~20% YoY luxury volume growth in Q4; unit growth alongside price supported outsized performance in Sotheby’s, Corcoran, and Coldwell Banker Global Luxury .
- Cost execution: ~$125M of 2024 cost savings (25% above initial target), lifting Operating EBITDA to $290M for FY24 (+$35M YoY) .
- Stable agent economics: Commission splits ~80% for 11 straight quarters; Q4 at 80.3% (down 7 bps YoY), supporting margin management while adding 28 franchisees in Q4 and 67 in 2024 .
-
What Went Wrong
- GAAP losses persisted: Q4 net loss of $64M (improved YoY), reflecting depreciation/amortization, interest expense, and impairment/restructuring drag; FY24 net loss was $128M .
- Title margins remained negative: Q4 Title Group Operating EBITDA -$9M and FY24 -$13M, with cost investments (e.g., Upward Title rollout) offsetting purchase/refi improvement .
- Free cash flow moderated YoY: FY24 FCF $50M (vs $67M in 2023) due to timing factors and one-time settlement, though Q4 FCF improved to $33M from -$13M in Q4’23 .
Financial Results
Revenue, earnings, profitability, and cash metrics (oldest → newest):
Segment performance (revenues and Operating EBITDA) (oldest → newest):
Key KPIs (oldest → newest):
Vs. estimates (context)
- S&P Global consensus could not be retrieved at this time. Third‑party indicates Q4 revenue beat and EPS miss: Revenue actual $1.36B vs $1.28B est; GAAP EPS actual -$0.58 vs -$0.36 est (caution: methodologies may differ) .
Guidance Changes
Balance sheet/leverage context: Net corporate debt (ex securitizations) $2.437B and Net Debt Leverage 7.2x at 12/31/24; Senior Secured Leverage 1.22x .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO on 2024 and 2025 priorities: “We delivered industry‑leading EBITDA… We are excited to leverage our competitive advantages in 2025, including… innovating with generative AI… and capitalizing on our position of strength” .
- AI impact: “Listing Concierge… named best use of AI… leads are seeing a 40+% improvement in conversion rates… we process about 15,000 documents a day… with generative AI… fewer than half the team… error rates as low as 1 in 5,000” .
- Policy stance: On Clear Cooperation, “relax not repeal… transparency and access to all inventory… if the market evolves to private listings… we are ready… ensure our agents… are never disadvantaged” .
- CFO on cost and FCF: “We realized nearly $125 million of cost savings… Free cash flow was $70 million before a $20 million litigation settlement payment… we anticipate our 2025 free cash flow, excluding one‑time items, to be similar to 2024” .
- Splits stability: “This marks 11 consecutive quarters with our agent commission split rate about 80%” .
Q&A Highlights
- 2025 EBITDA guide assumptions: Housing market is the biggest swing factor; cost savings embedded; splits stable around ~80% underpinning confidence .
- Clear Cooperation policy: Anywhere advocates “relax not repeal”; prepared to leverage listing scale and technology if private networks gain traction .
- Buyer agreements adoption: >80% of buyers now signing six‑month exclusive agreement; company may discontinue low‑usage alternatives .
- Sensitivity and definition changes: EBITDA definition now includes non‑cash comp and certain legal contingencies; impact historically small ($12M in 2023, $17M in 2024); growth to $350M guide is apples‑to‑apples .
- M&A funding and covenants: Preference to be a cash buyer; synergy capture (including covenant recognition) supports deal economics; disciplined approach .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus unavailable at time of analysis; results vs third‑party expectations indicate: Revenue beat ($1.36B vs $1.28B est) and GAAP EPS miss (-$0.58 vs -$0.36 est). Methodologies may differ from S&P Global and may mix GAAP/non‑GAAP; use with caution .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Continued luxury outperformance, stable commission splits, and disciplined cost execution supported an 86% YoY increase in Q4 Operating EBITDA despite GAAP losses; these factors underpin the FY25 EBITDA guide of ~$350M .
- 2025 free cash flow excluding one‑time items expected to be similar to 2024, but investors should model ~$115M of one‑time cash headwinds (antitrust, legacy tax, TCPA), affecting timing of deleveraging and capital allocation .
- Early 2025 activity (Jan closed +12%, open +4%) offers a constructive near‑term setup if macro conditions stabilize; watch California wildfire impact and broader affordability/inventory constraints .
- Strategic positioning: strong luxury franchises, AI‑enabled efficiency, and readiness for potential listing‑policy shifts (including private networks) present optionality in multiple industry scenarios .
- Title remains an area of opportunity but near‑term margin drag persists amid rollout and cost investments; progress on Upward Title JV expansion could help medium‑term profitability .
- For trading, catalysts include: confirmation of improving volume trends, execution on cost savings (Reimagine ’25), clarity on one‑time cash timing, and any M&A accretive to margins and synergies .